النموذج الرياضي للتحكم في الصيد التجاري من خلال التحسين التفاضلي العددي
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/bsj.Vol21.Iss37.1562الكلمات المفتاحية:
التحكم الأمثل في الصيد، استراتيجية الصيد، هيكلية مصايد الأسماك، المنهجيةالملخص
في الصيد التجاري، يسعى الصيادون إلى الاعتماد على دالة ربحية متكاملة للتحكم الأمثل في تكلفة الصيد وعائدات بيع الأسماك. ويتأثر الصيد بكمية الأسماك التي يتم صيدها سنويًا. والهدف هو تعظيم عائدات الصيد على مدى خمس سنوات. في حال الصيد الجائر (ارتفاع معدل الصيد)، تنخفض عائدات السنوات اللاحقة ولا يتعافى مخزون الأسماك. وتتلخص هذه المسألة في إيجاد الشكل الأمثل للاستخراج من اجل تعظيم ربح الصيد التجاري. لذا، قمنا بإنشاء نموذج رياضي لحل مشكلة التحكم الاقتصادي الأمثل في الصيد التجاري. استخدمنا برنامجًا لتحسين النموذج وعرض النتائج
المراجع
1. M. Z. Yameen, A. K. Junejo, Z. Lu, R. A. Siddiqui, F. F. M. El-Sousy, and I. Naveed, “Hybrid GOA and PSO optimization for load frequency control in renewable multi-source dual area power systems,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 17549, 2025.
2. J. K. Abbott, D. K. Lew, J. C. Whitehead, and R. T. Woodward, “The Future of Fishing for Fun: The Economics and Sustainable Management of Recreational Fisheries,” Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, no. May, pp. 0–43, 2022, doi: 10.1086/720987.
3. Y. Sun, G. Lv, W. Liu, and P. Auger, “Optimal placement of marine protected areas for a predator--prey fish model,” Int. J. Biomath., vol. 18, no. 07, p. 2450034, 2025.
4. C. M. Anderson et al., “How commercial fishing effort is managed,” Fish Fish., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 268–285, 2019, doi: 10.1111/faf.12339.
5. S. E. Rees et al., “An evaluation of the social and economic impact of a Marine Protected Area on commercial fisheries,” Fish. Res., vol. 235, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105819.
6. L. D. R. Beal, J. Park, D. Petersen, S. Warnick, and J. D. Hedengren, “Combined model predictive control and scheduling with dominant time constant compensation,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 104, pp. 271–282, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.04.024.
7. Y. Miyauchi, K. Nakajima, and S. J. Redding, Consumption Access and the Spatial Concentration of Economic Activity: Evidence from Smartphone Data. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3795016.
8. [8] H. Alahmer et al., “Optimal water addition in emulsion diesel fuel using machine learning and sea-horse optimizer to minimize exhaust pollutants from diesel engine,” Atmosphere (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 449, 2023.
9. X. Chen and J. Sun, “Revising the Motion Control Parameter Optimization Research of a Two-Wheel Differential Car,” in Actuators, 2024, p. 504.
10. T. Hai et al., “Optimizing ternary hybrid nanofluids using neural networks, gene expression programming, and multi-objective particle swarm optimization: a computational intelligence strategy,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1986, 2025.
11. J. Drgovna et al., “All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 50, pp. 190–232, 2020.
12. K. O. Achema, D. Okuonghae, and C. J. Alhassan, “A mathematical model for assessing the impact of dual-level toxicity on aquatic biospecies and its optimal control analysis,” Math. Model. Control, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 100, 2022.
13. S. Wales and K. Barclay, Economic analysis & Social and Economic monitoring following the NSW Commercial Fisheries Business Adjustment Program Prepared for the Department of Primary Industries, New. University of Technology Sydney, 2007. [Online]. Available: www.isf.uts.edu.au
14. V. Humphrey, M. Rodell, and A. Eicker, “Using satellite-based terrestrial water storage data: a review,” Surv. Geophys., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1489–1517, 2023.
15. C. Hammarlund, P. Jonsson, D. Valentinsson, and S. Waldo, “Economic and environmental effects of replacing bottom trawling with fishing with creels,” Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 94–118, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.12409.
16. ] F. Aljehani, I. N’Doye, and T.-M. Laleg-Kirati, “Feeding control and water quality monitoring in aquaculture systems: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2306.09920, 2023.
17. S. Ghambari, M. Golabi, L. Jourdan, J. Lepagnot, and L. Idoumghar, “Uav path planning techniques: a survey,” vol. 58, pp. 2951–2989, 2024.
18. S. (Reza) Zekavat et al., An Overview on Position Location: Past, Present, Future, vol. 28, no. 1. Springer US, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10776-021-00504-z.
19. M. Jabari, S. Ekinci, D. Izci, M. Bajaj, and I. Zaitsev, “Efficient DC motor speed control using a novel multi-stage FOPD (1+ PI) controller optimized by the Pelican optimization algorithm,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 22442, 2024.
20. M. A. S. Mustafa and H. H. Abbood, “Optimization of Different Materials for Drone Blades Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25836–25843, 2025.
21. A. Ghouali, A. Moussaoui, P. Auger, and T. N. Huu, “Optimal placement of marine protected areas to avoid the extinction of the fish stock,” J. Biol. Syst., vol. 30, no. 02, pp. 323–337, 2022.
22. ] L. Guo, X. Shu, and Y. Zhu, “Smart Farming with Swarm Intelligence : Hybrid Algorithm for Optimal Multi- Drone Plant Protection Paths,” vol. 62, no. May 2024, pp. 413–423, 2025, doi: 10.21162/PAKJAS/25.9225.
23. M. Pierallini, R. K. M. Gopanunni, F. Angelini, A. Bicchi, and M. Garabini, “Fishing for data: Modeling, optimal planning, and iterative learning control for flexible link robots,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2025.
24. L. S. L. Teh, N. Hotte, and U. R. Sumaila, “Having it all: can fisheries buybacks achieve capacity, economic, ecological, and social objectives?,” Marit. Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40152-016-0055-z.
25. R. W. R. Parker, K. Hartmann, B. S. Green, C. Gardner, and R. A. Watson, “Environmental and economic dimensions of fuel use in Australian Fisheries,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.081.
26. H. Song et al., “Reservoir Dynamic Reserves Characterization and Model Development Based on Differential Processing Method: Differentiated Development Strategies for Reservoirs with Different Bottom Water Energies,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 2053, 2025.
27. ] P. Pita et al., “Assessing Knowledge Gaps and Management Needs to Cope With Barriers for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability of Marine Recreational Fisheries: The Case of Spain,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 7, no. January, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00023.
28. V. Yalama, O. Yakovleva, V. Trandafilov, and M. Khmelniuk, “Future Sustainable Maritime Sector: Energy Efficiency Improvement and Environmental Impact Reduction for Fishing Carriers Older than 20 Years in the Fleet Part II,” Polish Marit. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 78–88, 2022, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2022-0028.
29. N. Hansen, X. Wang, and H. Su, “Temporal difference learning for model predictive control,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2203.04955, 2022.
30. [ R. Dom’inguez-May, G. R. Poot-López, J. M. Hernández, and I. Velázquez-Abunader, “Optimization of feed ration size in aquatic system according to the optimal control approach: implications of using the von Bertalanffy growth model,” Aquac. Res., vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 6512507, 2024.
31. S. K. Sahoo et al., “Moth flame optimization: theory, modifications, hybridizations, and applications,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 391–426, 2023.
32. [ D. Nataraj and M. Subramanian, “Design and optimal tuning of fractional order PID controller for paper machine headbox using jellyfish search optimizer algorithm,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1631, 2025.
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 م. د. كرار حبيب هاشم المديرية العامة للتربية في بابل، وزارة التربية والتعليم الرياضيات التطبيقية، م. د. مازن كريم كاظم مرجان المديرية العامة للتربية في بابل، وزارة التربية والتعليم الرياضيات التطبيقية
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
