Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Survey of Awareness and Readiness Among Iraqi Medical Students

Authors

  • Dr.Rana H.Raheema. Professor Wasit University/College of Medicine/Department of Medical Microbiology College of Medicine/Department of Medical Microbiology
  • Zahraa A.Jasem Wasit University/College of Medicine/Department of Medical Microbiology
  • ,Hajer N.Mohammed Wasit University/College of Medicine/Department of Medical Microbiology
  • Safa M.Sadeq Wasit University/College of Medicine/Department of Medical Microbiology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/bsj.Vol21.Iss37.1503

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence; Medical education; Iraq; Advantages and Disadvantages

Abstract

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative technology across numerous sectors, particularly in medicine. With the rapid advancement in AI tools and their integration into healthcare, there is a growing need for medical students to understand, adapt to, and utilize these technologies effectively. However, gaps in formal education and practical exposure remain significant, particularly in developing countries such as Iraq. This study aims to assess the level of awareness, attitudes, and readiness of undergraduate medical students in Iraq regarding the use of artificial intelligence in medicine. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 461 medical students from various public and private universities in Iraq. Data were collected through a structured online questionnaire distributed via student forums and social media platforms. The questionnaire covered demographic information, knowledge and usage of AI, perceived benefits and drawbacks, and preferences for AI education. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data using SPSS software.

The majority of participants (95.2%) reported using AI tools, with ChatGPT being the most widely used. However, only a small percentage had received formal AI training, and most relied on self-learning. A significant number (63.3%) expressed a strong desire for further education in AI, especially in fields like surgery, health data management, and disease diagnosis. Students generally agreed that AI could improve medical education and clinical accuracy, although many raised concerns about ethical issues, data privacy, and the impact of AI on future employment. There was also broad support for integrating AI into the medical curriculum. The study highlights a substantial interest among Iraqi medical students in the application of AI in healthcare, despite limited formal exposure. These findings indicate a critical need for structured AI education within the medical curriculum. Addressing this gap will better prepare future healthcare professionals to responsibly and effectively implement AI tools in clinical practice, contributing to improved patient outcomes and healthcare innovation

References

1. Amisha, Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2328–31.

2. Li Q, Qin Y. AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2023;23(1):852.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04700-8

3. Alghamdi SA, Alashban Y. Medical science students’ attitudes and perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A national study conducted in Saudi Arabia. J Radiat Res Appl Sci [Internet]. 2024;17(1):100815.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850723002935

4. Chen M, Zhang B, Cai Z, Seery S, Gonzalez MJ, Ali NM, et al. Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front Med. 2022;9:990604.

5. Kwak Y, Ahn JW, Seo YH. Influence of AI ethics awareness, attitude, anxiety, and self-efficacy on nursing students’ behavioral intentions. BMC Nurs [Internet]. 2022;21(1):267.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01048-0

6. Huisman, Merel, et al. "An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude." European radiology 31.9 (2021): 7058-7066.‏

7. Al-Qerem W, Eberhardt J, Jarab A, Al Bawab AQ, Hammad A, Alasmari F, Alazab B, Husein DA, Alazab J, Al-Beool S. Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions’ students in Jordan. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):288.

8. Hua D, Petrina N, Young N, Cho JG, Poon SK. Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Artif Intell Med. 2024;147:102698. Epub 2023 Nov 9. PMID: 38184343.

9. Lambert SI, Madi M, Sopka S, Lenes A, Stange H, Buszello CP, Stephan A. An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):111.

10. Jackson P, Ponath Sukumaran G, Babu C, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education - perception among medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:804. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05760-0.

11. Imran N, Jawaid M. Artificial intelligence in medical education: are we ready for it? Pakistan J Med Sci. 2020;36(5):857.

12. Allam, Ahmed Hafez, et al. "Knowledge, attitude, and perception of Arab medical students towards artificial intelligence in medicine and radiology: a multi-national cross-sectional study." European radiology 34.7 (2024): 1-14.

13. Neri E, de Souza N, Brady A et al (2019) What the radiologist should know about artificial intelligence – an ESR white paper. Insights Imaging 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13244-019-0738-2

14. Hricak H (2018) 2016 New Horizons Lecture: beyond imaging—radiology of tomorrow. Radiology 286:764–775. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171503

15. Hamet P, Tremblay J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metab - Clin Exp [Internet]. 2017;69:S36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011

16. Howard J. Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. Am J Ind Med [Internet]. 2019;62(11):917–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23037

17. Odat M, Marsool Marsool R, Nguyen MD, Idrees D, Hussein M, Ghabally AM et al. M,. Presurgery and postsurgery: advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning models for enhancing patient management in infective endocarditis. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2024;110(11). https://journals.lww.com/international-journal-

18. Hamad M, Qtaishat F, Mhairat E, Al-Qunbar A, Jaradat M, Mousa A, et al. Artificial intelligence readiness among Jordanian medical students: using medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS). J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024;11:23821205241281650.

19. Dai Y, Chai CS, Lin PY, Jong MSY, Guo Y, Qin J. Promoting Students’ Well-Being by Developing Their Readiness for the Artificial Intelligence Age. Sustainability [Internet]. 2020; https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:225451861

20. Jebreen K, Radwan E, Kammoun-Rebai W, Alattar E, Radwan A, Safi W, et al. Perceptions of undergraduate medical students on artificial intelligence in medicine: mixed-methods survey study from Palestine. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):507.

21. Hanifa H, Amro AM. Promoting equity in medical research: ensuring access to publishing opportunities for researchers in Syria and Palestine. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2024;24(1):1371: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06375-1

22. Truong NM, Vo TQ, Tran HTB, Nguyen HT, Pham VNH. Healthcare students’ knowledge,attitudes, and perspectives toward artificial intelligence in the southern Vietnam.Heliyon [Internet]. 2023;9(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22653.

23. Buabbas AJ, Miskin B, Alnaqi AA, Ayed AK, Shehab AA, Syed-Abdul S et al. Investigating students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence in medical education. Healthc (Basel Switzerland). 2023;11(9).

24. Lugito NPH, Cucunawangsih C, Suryadinata N, Kurniawan A, Wijayanto R, Sungono V, et al. Readiness, knowledge, and perception towards artificial intelligence of medical students at faculty of medicine, Pelita Harapan university, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1044.

25. Swed S, Alibrahim H, Elkalagi NK, Nasif MN, Rais MA, Nashwan AJ, Aljabali A, Elsayed M, Sawaf B, Albuni MK, Battikh E. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Syria: a cross-sectional online survey. Front Artif Intell. 2022; 5:1011524. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.1011524.

26. Park CJ, Paul HY, Siegel EL. Medical student perspectives on the impact of artificial intelligence on the practice of medicine. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021;50(5):614–9.

27. Wartman SA, Combs CD. Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1107–9.

28. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.

29. Al-Hassnawi SM, Abbas AA. Awareness and use of artificial intelligence among medical students in Baghdad. Iraqi J Med Sci. 2023;21(2):89–97.

30. Hassan AB, Al-Mousawi AM. Digital literacy and AI readiness among healthcare students in Basrah. Basrah J Med Res. 2024;16(1):55–62.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles