The Morphological Integration of English Loanwords in Mosuli Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/bsj.Vol21.Iss35.1277Abstract
The present study comprehensively tackles English loanwords of monolingual speakers, i.e. established loanwords, or bilingual speakers, i.e. spontaneous loanwords. English loanwords have become more widely used in speech as well as writings of Mosuli Arabic (henceforth MA). Therefore, it is important to know to what extent English loanwords are morphologically affected by Arabic paradigm. The problem of the study indeed is what the morphological changes English loanwords have undergone. This is considered as challengeable since English and MA are more typologically different. Thus, integration of many words from English into MA are said to be more complex. The study aims at investigating and analysing these lexemes from the morphological perspective. Data collection has been based on two genres: naturally occurring conversations of Mosuli Arabic participants and contemporary social medias. Qualitative method has been used to invigorate the descriptive analysis of 100 English loanwords as a representative sample, following Salem’s model (2015). The findings have shown that these loanwords have undergone significant morphological changes. Key patterns of integration have included assigning English loan lexemes to derivational and inflectional word-formation patterns. Again, English loan lexemes have been treated as roots for creating new other words. The light verb with indirect insertion processes has been used for generally merging many loan verbs. Additional strategies like compounding and clipping have been observed as well. English loan nouns have also been adapted to grammatical features like gender, number and possessive. Finally, it has been concluded that English loanwords have extensively been integrated, whether partially or fully, into morphological system of MA.
References
1. Ali, M. (1987). A Linguistic Study of the Development of Scientific Vocabulary in Standard Arabic. Routledge.
2. Appel, R., and Muysken, P. (1987). Language Contact and Bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press.
3. Auer, P. (1999). From Code-switching via Language Mixing to Fused Lects: Toward a Dynamic Typology of Bilingual Speech. International journal of bilingualism, 3(4), 309-332.
4. Bhatia, T. and Ritchie, W. C. (2004). Social and Psychological Factors in Language Mixing. In The Handbook of Bilingualism. Blackwell Publishing.
5. Clyne, M. (1991). Community Languages: The Australian Experience. Cambridge University Press.
6. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press.
7. Field, F. (2002). Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts. John Benjamins Publishing.
8. Gadelii, N. (2015). The Morphological Integration of Loanwords into Modern Standard Arabic. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis in General Linguistics, Lund University.
9. Harley, H. (2006). English words: A linguistic Introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
10. Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical Borrowing: Concept and Issues. Loanwords in the world’s Languages: A Ccomparative Handbook. Mouton de Gruyter, 35-54.
11. Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties. Georgetown University Press.
12. Johanson, L. (2002). Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. Curzon Press.
13. Katamba, F. (2005). English Words: Structure, History, Usage. Routledge.
14. Khasarah, M. (2000). Al-Muʻarrab wa Al-Dakhil fi Al-Majallat Al-Mutakhasisah. Majallah Mujamaʻ Al-Lughah Al-Arabiyyah bi-Dimashq. 75 (4): 919- 942.
15. Kortmann, B. (2005). English Linguistics: Essentials. Cornelsen Verlag GmbH.
16. Matras, Y. and Sakel, J. (2007). Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Matras, Y. (2009). Language Contact. Cambridge University Press.
18. Mattiello, E. (2013). Extra-grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Walter de Gruyter.
19. Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge University Press.
20. Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford University Press.
21. Onysko, A. (2007). Anglicisms in German: Borrowing, Lexical Productivity, and Written Codeswitching. Walter de Gruyter.
22. Pereltsvaig, A. (2012). Languages of the World: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
23. Poplack, S. (2020). Sometimes I'll Start a Sentence in Spanish y Termino en Español: Toward a Typology of Code-Switching. Linguistics, 18(7/8): 581-618.
24. Poplack, S., Sankoff, D. and Miller, C. (1988). The Social Correlates and Linguistic Processes of Lexical Borrowing and Assimilation. Linguistics, 26(1), 47-104.
25. Ryding, K. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
26. Sakel, J. (2007). Types of Loan: Matter and Pattern. Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, (15):15-31.
27. Salem, E. (2015). Loanwords in Jordanian Arabic. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manchester.
28. Tadmor, U. (2009). Loanwords in the World’s Languages: Findings and Results. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook, 55, 75.
29. Thomason, S. and Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. University of California Press.
30. Treffers-Daller, J. (1994). Mixing Two Languages: French-Dutch Contact in a Comparative Perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Wichmann, S. and Wohlgemuth, J. (2008). Loan Verbs in a Typological Perspective. In: Stolz, T., Bakker, D. and Salas Palomo, R. (eds.). Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romanisation processes, 89-122.
32. Winford, D. (2003). An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.
33. Winford, D. (2010). Contact and Borrowing. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.). The Handbook of Language Contact, 170-187. Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 م.م. سندس فلاح محمد في علم اللغة و تدريس اللغة الإنكليزية الجامعة التقنية الشمالية

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.