Indicators of Future Ambition Among Kindergarten Children and Mechanisms for Fostering It in Light of Future Life Requirements

Authors

  • Asst. Lecturer Zaman Karim Muhaisin Abbas Al-Shammari Wasit University / College of Basic Education جامعة واسط كلية التربية الاساسية

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/bsj.Vol23.Iss46.1975

Keywords:

Future Aspirations, Kindergarten Children, Future Life Requirements, Development Mechanisms

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the level, domains, and ranking of future aspiration indicators among kindergarten children, examine differences according to gender and kindergarten type, and determine the importance of mechanisms for developing future aspirations in light of future life requirements from teachers’ perspectives. The study employed a descriptive survey method with a comparative dimension. The population consisted of 400 children and 80 teachers, from which a sample of 250 children and 50 teachers was selected from public and private kindergartens affiliated with the Al-Aziziyah Directorate of Education in Wasit Governorate. Two instruments were used: a 30-item Future Aspiration Indicators Scale and a 30-item questionnaire on development mechanisms, each comprising six domains. Data were analyzed using means, standard deviations, relative weights, Pearson correlation, Cronbach’s alpha, one-sample and independent-samples t-tests, Levene’s test, and effect size. Results showed a high level of future aspiration indicators among children, with an overall mean of 112.900; confidence in the ability to succeed ranked first. No statistically significant differences were found according to gender or kindergarten type. Teachers also reported a high level of importance for future aspiration development mechanisms, with an overall mean of 124.940; psychological and social support mechanisms ranked first. No statistically significant differences were found in teachers’ responses according to kindergarten type.

References

المصادر:

1. Atance, C. M.,&Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). My future self: Young children’s ability to anticipate and explain future states. Cognitive Development, 20(3), 341–361.

2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

3. Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S.,&Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praiseto 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526–1541.

4. Hudson, J. A., Shapiro, L. R.,&Sosa, B. B. (1995). Planning in the real world: Preschool children’s scripts and plans for familiar events. Child Development, 66(4), 984–998.

5. Locke, E. A.,&Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

6. Markus, H.,&Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

7. National Association for the Education of Young Children,&Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media. (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. NAEYC.

8. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2020). Developmentally appropriate practice: A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. NAEYC.

9. Nurmi, J.-E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1–59.

10. OECD. (2019a). Student agency for 2030. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework.

11. OECD. (2019b). Skills for 2030. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework.

12. OECD. (2019c). Transformative competencies for 2030. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework.

13. Quaglia, R. J.,&Cobb, C. D. (1996). Toward a theory of student aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 127–132.

14. Ryan, R. M.,&Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

15. Skene, K., O’Farrelly, C. M., Byrne, E. M., Kirby, N., Stevens, E. C.,&Ramchandani, P. G. (2022). Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 93(4), 1162–1180.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles